User talk:Rj

Conservation status: Vulnerable

New Edits

↓ Push onto the Stack Here ↓

Diana L. Gomez

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Diana L. Gomez, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Automobiles Notification

Hi Rj, you were on the list of members at WikiProject Automobiles and we are introducing a new way of listing members, as the old list was becoming too long. Our new method involves having all of our members in a category.

To add yourself to the category just add the userbox to your user page by putting {{Wiki Auto Project}} where you want the userbox. Alternatively if you don't like the userbox you can add [[Category:WikiProject Automobiles members|Rj]] to your userpage.

If you no longer wish to be a member of the project, simply don't add the userbox or category, there's no pressure. Thanks for your time, James086^{Talk | Contribs} 04:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

You may wish to take note and/or comment:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voyage Au Pays Des Nouveaux Gourous Yours, Smeelgova 17:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Intriguing Edits

Have a look over at the article you had edited previously and let me know what you think RE: putting a brief bit about origins in the beginning, and the campaign to summarily remove any perceived negative information even if it's backed up by multiple cited sources in blockquoted citation referenced format. Thank you for your time. Yours, Smeelgova 17:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]

New Category

I liked how you created a new category for The Hunger Project. I have never created a new category, so perhaps you would be interested in creating one to encompass either Werner Erhard and/or Landmark Education and Erhard Seminars Training? Thank you for your time.Smeelgova 13:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ellis Duell

You may be interested in commenting, on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellis Duell.Smeelgova 02:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kent-Meridian High School

Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent-Meridian High School, I just thought you'd like to know that the consensus for deleting High School articles now appears to be swinging back in favor of deletion. So this may indicate the beginning of another campaign to remove most High School articles. Your opinion on the AfD article would be appreciated. It might be helpful if a notability standard for High Schools could be agreed upon. Thank you. — RJH (talk) 16:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at estate in law

You appear to be the original author of an article estate in land; this is a difficult subject as land law varies greatly between jurisdictions. Could you please look at its talk page and comment, preferably there? Peterkingiron 20:38, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/(The Hunger Project)]], and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipedical (talk • contribs)

Possible need for Administrator Intervention at The Hunger Project

There is a need for more balance, and both positive AND negative sides to be represented in this article on The Hunger Project.

(Smeelgova, Descendall, Enkido, Pedant17, Rj) :

Is there a way that we (Smeelgova, Descendall, Enkido, Pedant17, Rj), can go to Wikipedia Administrators to resolve the positively-biased one-sided view that Jcoonrod purports to keep posting up on The Hunger Project, and also complain about his repeated deletions both on the article and discussion pages?Smeelgova 05:10, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit made to your user page

Hi Rj. Thanks for your message - please remember to sign your messages using four tildes ("~~~~") so that other editors can quickly see who has left the message. Sorry if you already knew about that and you just forgot.

With regard to the edit I made to your user page, this was as per the procedure for deleting images - image deletions should be carried out cleanly without leaving broken links. Hope this explains why I edited your page. Regards, CLW 07:51, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)

Hi, I noticed your edit to the dab page CSO where you helped format the page. I have to complain, though, because you bolded all the entries. This is actually discouraged on MOS:DP, and I clean up such overbolding whenever I see it. Thanks for helping out anyway! Melchoir 04:58, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Important WikiProject Automobiles Discussion

Hello! As a Wikipedia:WikiProject Automobiles member, I just thought you might want to input your opinions on an important discussion we're currently having about whether articles regarding similar vehicles should be merged into one or split by brand. If you would like to comment or read further, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles#Articles of Similar Vehicles. Thank you in advance for your thoughts and feedback. Airline 23:50, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lifespring

Hey thought you might be interested, someone removed your category from the Lifespring page. See comments [1] cheers, TitaniumDreads 00:02, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CHNM Interview

Hello,

I’m a historian working at the Center for History and New Media at George Mason University and we are very interested in digital, peer-produced works of history, including history articles in Wikipedia. We’d like to talk to people about their experiences working on articles in Wikipedia, in connection with a larger project on the history of the free and open source software movement. Would you be willing to talk with us about your involvement, either by phone, a/v chat, IM, or email? This could be as lengthy or brief a conversation as you wish.

Thanks for your consideration.

Ken Albers

kalbers at gmu dot edu

The corrupting power of the mop and bucket

David Oreck

Nice start on the David Oreck article. I think the guy's absolutely fascinating and I took the liberty to expand it a bit. - Lucky 6.9 20:17, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

- You bet. It's articles like that one which make this site worthwhile. - Lucky 6.9 23:01, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Short articles

Hello! Short articles are welcome, but reposting that little stub about the Pennsylvania conservancy without any further information isn't much help to an end user. Can you please add more to it than what someone might already ascertain from the title? Thanks! - Lucky 6.9 05:35, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of U.S. cities with large Chinese American populations

I added List of U.S. cities with Asian American majority populations and List of U.S. cities with large Vietnamese American populations back under related topics because they belong there. Chinese Americans are a subgroup of Asian Americans. There is a connection between the Vietnamese American and Chinese American communities, not only because they are both Asian groups, but also because a significant number of Vietnamese Americans are of Chinese descent. — J3ff 22:52, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

On that note, I made similar changes to related topic section of List of U.S. cities with large Vietnamese American populations for the same reason. — J3ff 22:54, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Fixed your racism

Fixed your racism haha. There is now a List of U.S. communities with caucasian majority populations started. However I need someone to help me contest it's deletion. I think it's only fair if there is one for other races for one to exist for caucasians. Please help expand, and if you know why any of the cities are distributed this way please add it. Thanks Cato1986 16:56, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bio-stub

RJ: I wasn't aware of the bio-stub boilerplate, but I will give it a try next time I need it (which should be later today). Thanks! Steve Casburn 21:14, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

NAMBLA

As I saw that you edited Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal I would like to invite you to help with conflicts in the article about the "North American Man/Boy love organization" as well. Get-back-world-respect 20:26, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

is this for real?!?

Houston Mayors

Your welcome. If you plan to continue writing articles about Houston mayors, you can find many of their birth and death dates at http://www.rulers.org/uscit.html and then click on the heading for Houston. Academic Challenger 05:01, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Dude! I just revised your Houston mayors pages (and added a page for Oscar F. Holcombe). Check them out and let me know what you think -- I should have dropped you a line before I got started, but by the time I thought of that, I was halfway through. Steve Casburn 04:24, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

i didn't know he served 11 terms. thanks.

List of Hospitals

I have begun expanding the List of hospitals to include every country in the world, you may want to check for omissions and spelling errors in what I have added. I have completed the Europe list (I think). -JCarriker 01:25, May 22, 2004 (UTC)

EXLOG and other new articles

When writing a new article, could you add a sentence or two saying what it is that you are writing out? For example, I could not understand if EXLOG is a company, an institute at Stanford or something else. Andris 20:59, May 1, 2004 (UTC)

Yeah, that's usually how my stubs start out...

Fields of interest

Thanks. I'm trying to concentrate on non-contoversial topics at the moment, such as (hopefully) a list of hospitals. I'll probaly add my interests to List of Wikipedians by fields of interest eventually but I am currently trying to boost the number of my main space edits, so it will probably be a little while.

-JCarriker 12:31, Apr 14, 2004 (UTC)

Mutual fund scandal (2003)

Bill, nice work on the mutual fund article. Does "market timing" need to be defined more or is it the same as "late trading" in the article? --Rj 04:59, Apr 11, 2004 (UTC)

Whoops. I'm just seeing this now. Thanks. No, "late trading" and "market timing" are two different things. I'll add a definition to the article. -- Bill 22:48, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Thanks, i get it now... --Rj 01:28, Jul 25, 2004 (UTC)

Chess

Hi, I've started a discussion on which syntax(es) should be implemented for table-based chessboards. Your opinion is invited. Thanks. Arvindn 14:57, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Wikipedia Projects

Automobiles

Yeah it's pretty new.

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles/Layouts for some discussion on the project so far.

There is much work to be done still. The first major project I think should be to identify things to be done so that people can help out. Next maybe we need to look at the getting a standard layout together to help people assemble new articles. Any ideas are worth having though. akaDruid 12:16, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Honda Template

I added the hybrids to the Honda template -Unshortness 17:44, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

COTW

Article Creation and Improvement Drive

Though this project is inactive, you can help with :
Jason-Shane Scott (random unreferenced BLP of the day for 25 Dec 2024 - provided by User:AnomieBOT/RandomPage via WP:RANDUNREF).

Culture of Greece

Culture of Greece is this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article.

Partition of India

You voted for Partition of India, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article.

Underground Railroad

Congratulations, the candidate you voted for, Underground Railroad, is this week's Collaboration of the Week. Please help edit the article to bring it up to feature standard.

League of Nations

League of Nations is the new Collaboration of the Week. Please join in helping make it a feature article.

The Humungous Image Tagging Project

Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

Image:Tzero.bmp

Thanks for uploading Image:Tzero.bmp. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, – Quadell ^{(talk) (help)}[[]] 21:28, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

i think it was from the ac propulsion site

Hello. I've listed Image:Tzero.bmp as a copyright violation. I'm afraid that it's not legal to put upload most images to Wikipedia. To qualify, an image has to fall into one of three categories:

It can be in the public domain, such as an image produced by the U.S. government or a photo taken before 1923.
It can be releasable under the GFDL or a compatible license (which pretty much only applies to images you create yourself.)
It can be copyrighted but usable under a fair use claim. This one's complicated, but album covers or photos of historic events might count. Image:Tzero.bmp doesn't fall into this category.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Best regards, – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 13:50, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

Untagged images

Would you mind taking a look at User:Rj/wikiwork? None of the images there have image copyright tags. Broken Segue 23:45, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright tags

Thanks for uploading Image:Bill Bradley fishing with his Warren.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, Tagishsimon (talk) 00:32, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image:Edward O Wilson.jpg

Hello, Rj. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Edward O Wilson.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Rj/Misc. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:51, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:James Lovelock.jpg

Hello, Rj. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:James Lovelock.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Rj/Misc. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Qian Xueshen.jpg

Hello Rj, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Qian Xueshen.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Rj/Misc. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Shannon.jpg

Hello Rj, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Shannon.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Rj/Misc. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sisko8.jpg

Hello Rj, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Sisko8.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Rj/Misc. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 18:35, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Worldalmanac2007.jpg

Hello Rj, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Worldalmanac2007.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Rj/misc. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Euclid

Hello, the image of Euclid on your user page depicts Euclid of Megara, see WT:WPM#Image of Euclid and some details at the Wikicommons talk page. You may want to replace it with an image of Euclid of Alexandria. Cheers, Arcfrk 02:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Copyright violation

Hi,

I requested the article you created for Robert Haas, chairman of Levi Strauss be removed. The content was lifted directly from the copyrighted corporate webpage located here please avoid copy and pasting from protected sources. If you recall any other instances of copyright violation, please amend those pages.

Regards, lots of issues | leave me a message 21:51, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I don't mean to raise the level of hostility. However, please do consider revisiting any instances of copyright violation as it reflects poorly on the site.

Regards, lots of issues | leave me a message 06:12, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Shiv Nadar

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Shiv Nadar, by Feba (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Shiv Nadar is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Shiv Nadar, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Shiv Nadar itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 11:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unaccounted

Browsers

Some of us have browsers in which that is not possible,so I am including my comments at the bottom...L.E./12.144.5.2/le@put.com

no prob... but why do you not have a user account?

because I dislike the very concept of registration to participate on websites...I never do it anywhere.--L.E./12.144.5.2/le@put.com

Avoiding Duplications in Lists

I'd just like to say that I'm very disappointed that you put back the duplicative listings in the Supercentenarian article that I consider it important to avoid.People should be listed/linked only once when possible!--L.E./12.144.5.2/le@put.com

i disagree

I'll be blunt.After all the work I have put into that article as a distillation of my years of research in the supercentenarian field,I consider the inclusion of that table to have ruined it!
Louis Epstein/le@put.com/12.144.5.2

sorry 'bout that but shouldn't u put your work into a book so that it doesn't get altered?

Welcomes

When you're creating articles, could you please write complete sentences? RickK 02:49, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Hi there. I see you've been editing a little while, but I don't believe you've been properly welcomed to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log so we can meet you and help you get started.

If you need editing help, visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page. For format questions, visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. You can also drop me a question on my talk page

Happy editing, Isomorphic 18:03, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for your note on the new user log. Glad you like it here. Let me know if you need anything. Isomorphic 08:38, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)

↑ edit at the top ↑

AfD nomination of Marvin Pierce

I have nominated Marvin Pierce, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvin Pierce. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. --Michael White^T·C 18:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Catherine Austin Fitts

The article Catherine Austin Fitts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable business person, no references for extended period of time

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Capitalismojo (talk) 13:20, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Corporate scandal

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Corporate scandal. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate scandal. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rj! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 9 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Betsy Holden - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Paul Ingrassia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Donald Palumbo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Carlos F. Lucero - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Josefina Lopez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Joseph T. Ainsworth - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Charles Spence - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Carl Franklin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jean-Marc Perraud - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean-Marc Perraud

The article Jean-Marc Perraud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ridernyc (talk) 18:25, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rosemary Keough Redmond

I have nominated Rosemary Keough Redmond, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosemary Keough Redmond. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SnottyWong ^babble 18:01, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Susan Tannenbaum

An article that you have been involved in editing, Susan Tannenbaum, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Tannenbaum. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --MelanieN (talk) 00:12, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Donald Palumbo for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Donald Palumbo, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Palumbo until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Wordsmith^Communicate 07:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Schlumberger Information Solutions

The article Schlumberger Information Solutions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable subsidiary business that provides consulting, software, information management, and IT infrastructure services. No references other than to it's own website. Article is little more than a product list.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joseph T. Ainsworth Volunteer Community Award for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph T. Ainsworth Volunteer Community Award is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph T. Ainsworth Volunteer Community Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Gilmary Shea Prize

The article John Gilmary Shea Prize has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication or evidence of Notability. Was it only awarded once??

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PK T(alk) 14:34, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vanessa Vadim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vanessa Vadim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Vadim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Hunger Project

Category:The Hunger Project, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of political controversies in Australia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of political controversies in Australia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of political controversies in Australia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mqst north (talk) 10:59, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Disney family for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disney family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 21:02, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of hybrid vehicles

The article List of hybrid vehicles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nowadays the list is impossible to keep up to date as there must be hundreds of them. Even if you could keep it up to date it would be far too long.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of hybrid vehicles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of hybrid vehicles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hybrid vehicles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chidgk1 (talk) 07:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Society of Plastics Engineers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Society of Plastics Engineers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society of Plastics Engineers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 00:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators and help needed

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Proposed deletion of Joseph T. Ainsworth

The article Joseph T. Ainsworth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, only a few sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib3005 (talk) 16:24, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Rosenberg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jack Rosenberg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. scope_creep^Talk 14:56, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nathalie Vadim

The article Nathalie Vadim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]