Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to request protection for the Wikipedia page [Kundalpur Jain Temple (Bade Baba)] due to persistent vandalism and misinformation being added by certain individuals. The temple is a highly significant religious site for followers of the Digambar sect of Jainism, yet the page has repeatedly been altered with incorrect information, likely motivated by sectarian bias.
Nature of the Issue
1.Misinformation on Managing Body: The temple is managed by Shri Digambar Jain Atishay Kshetra Kundalpur Public Trust, but vandals have changed this to Shri Shwetambar Jain Atishay Kshetra Kundalpur Public Trust, which is factually incorrect.
2.Religious and Cultural Sensitivity: The temple holds immense importance for the Digambar Jain community. The repeated alterations appear to stem from hate or jealousy, which disrespects the faith and beliefs of millions.
Evidence of Vandalism
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bade_Baba_Temple&diff=1270028436&oldid=1268410418
16:28, 9 January 2025 User12231
15:40, 17 January 2025 Uts v Jain
Request for Protection
Given the sensitivity of the topic and the repeated vandalism, I kindly request:
1. Semi-protection: Restrict edits to registered and confirmed users.
2. Long-term protection: Given the likelihood of continued attempts at misinformation, I request protection for an extended period.
This will help ensure that the article maintains its accuracy and neutrality, in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines. Protecting this page would not only prevent further disruption but also respect the sentiments of the Jain community, particularly the Digambar sect.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please let me know if further details or evidence are needed.
Sincerely,
Anonymous 92.99.127.127 (talk) 12:43, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Forgiving the format and length here, you do realize that you will be unable to edit the article if it gets semi-protected? Daniel Case (talk) 07:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – This page suffers from persistent vandalism or unconstructive edits. This is the second time I have personally seen this in RC patrols. This article should probably be considered for permanent protection. m a MANÍ1990(talk | contribs) 20:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Edits do not appear to be vandalism, but there seems to be persistent blanking and insertion of promotional content. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:00, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Now with 16,000 transclusions, used by {{Cite wikisource}} which itself is TE-protected. — hike395 (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 20:44, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated whitewashing/turning into a hagiography by IPs and new editors 81.2.123.64 (talk) 21:12, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary cascade protection: It is a protected photo of the day and it will be main in under 48 hours 54rt678 (talk) 21:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A LTA keeps reporting User:CFA over and over using multiple accounts for a false claim of edit warring on a deleted article. Isla🏳️⚧ 22:11, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:RUSUKR. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 22:11, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – It looks like the person behind this indefinitely blocked account is now evading that block and continuing to disrupt its talk page using IP addresses. — AP 499D25 (talk) 23:51, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already unprotected by administrator Jpgordon. Favonian (talk) 11:06, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Dancing with the Stars (American TV series) season 28 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP editor. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. unconstructive edits. 50.100.44.204 (talk) 00:27, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. This page has a lengthy protection history, most recently for 2 years but previously for 1, and expired. I feel that this page should be indefinintly to prevent vandalism. Thank You. 50.100.44.204 (talk) 00:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shadow4dark (talk) 01:05, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/SCW&ISIL. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 01:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal started harassing me on my talkpage after I reverted their edits. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 02:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 02:41, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 02:49, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Salmoonlight (talk) 05:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-Protection: Disruptive editing of IP address and non-login account. Please, I request to protection this article. Panda Arun (talk) 05:11, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 05:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP editing that's been amplified since September, even spreading to the Simple English Wikipedia Surayeproject3 (talk) 06:57, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. moderate to high level of vandalism throughout its history, according to redwarn. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 07:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 08:14, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism by caste fanatics. I had reverted the spam edits made by fanatics. Minakshi Pillai (talk) 08:21, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Presistent uncited infobox editing by IPs. UtoD 08:55, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥ 论 09:11, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥ 论 09:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism over the past week - various IPs claiming (without source) that this footballer is Malaysian, which is not backed by his former club's profile. Iiii I I I (talk) 09:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by anonymous IPs Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 11:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: From January 13 to 19, IP submits statements without citations despite being reverted. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 12:38, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and repeated disruptive edits compromising the accuracy and neutrality of the article. 5.29.97.182 (talk) 13:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, left unremoved for hours, following recent controversial NFL playoff match that Martin officiated Toffeenix (talk) 13:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple IP link/reference removal. Possible disruptive edits are from an IP hopper. MysticCipher87(alt-account) (talk) 14:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism, IP(s) have been warned multiple times about not adding unsourced false information and continues to add it. Multiple IPs have been adding it but I suspect they're the same person because it's all the same edit. Di (they-them) (talk) 15:02, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The page has become IP editor edit-warring hell. Request semi-protection to alleviate this. BarntToust 15:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent sock vandalism over the past week. Generalrelative (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because I don't want this page being protected....... . 113.165.167.192 (talk) 09:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- This is one of the IPs that is restoring edits made by the same socks (user:Tsing Yi Epidemic, user:Yishun NCS etc) that led to the page being protected in the first place. Meters (talk) 10:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, the IPs are restoring edits by these blocked users to other articles, not Mobilize Limo. Meters (talk) 10:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:05, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – Thanks for demonstrating the continued need for keeping the redirect protected. Favonian (talk) 11:05, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Add “by June 30, 2024” to the sentence: The Lancet has estimated 70,000 deaths due to traumatic injuries.[8] Seahumidity (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request that... (the status section for the front page should be labeled as “ceasefire” until the ceasefire ends. This is in accordance with the recently-reached agreement.) . LordOfWalruses (talk) 04:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request that the information given here be less biased and provides all facts, including the details of her assassination. And you wonder why Wikipedia is being touted as biased as Google. Provide the info, don't guide it.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.